One should not take his freedom to criticize for granted, but he should be aware of the intensity of his criticism as well as how his audience might interpret his criticism. In the US, it is not uncommon to see last week’s government issues as next Saturday evening’s satire. Although this serves as great entertainment, I believe the broadcasting of government mockery should have a few limits. Other countries that might not be our closest of friends could see this mockery as national weakness and maybe act upon that instinct. I agree that our government can be more flawed than not, but I think it would be in our best interest to appear strong and united rather than weak and divided.
Food for Thought:
Within this school year, due to the assortment of guests, self-conducted research, and a better understanding of government, I have come to a greater appreciation for my rights as an American citizen. Previously I had taken for granted the freedom to criticize,oblivious to the number of countries where this freed0m is banned. Through research for this specific blog, I wandered upon an organization called Freedom House, "a US-based international non-governmental organization that conducts research and advocacy on democracy, political freedom, and human rights." The organization's website (http://www.freedomhouse.org/) offers a different perspective on the global fight for freedom and provides an interesting graphic of the current "map of freedom in the world".
2 comments:
It's hard to think of the "public" or more so the media, not having a say or an opinion, usually critical, dealing with anything, especially government/issues. Our right to voice our opinions is a great freedom of our country, but does it have ill effects?! If
Post a Comment